In my opinion, it has never been Sartre's goal or intentions to merge existentialism with marxism.|||Sartre was the last noted existentialist and even he gave it up a couple months before his death and by his own words, rejecting all that he had said before.
Sartre was a confirmed Marxist but not communist because he did not feel that the communist countries as they were operating were any more than a tyrantical form of dictatorship. he supported and fought for the establishment of a couple communist countries because he hoped they would become truly Marixst. Each time he was proven wrong.
Sartre, as opposed to Nietzsche the first noted existentialst, looked as life as a journey involving happiness as the result of actions instead of gloom and dispair and doing nothing.
So it is doubtful that Sartre's actions combined the two named items|||Sartre was the phylosopher who succeed in explain the concept of liberty. A totality is free because it continuosly destotalize. In my opinion he used the dialectik to show how the totality is created and with the existencialism he could fight against the concept of determined totality politically expresed in stalinist determinism. He used dialectik to show how the totality is not forever. .
On the other hand, Sartre criticized exitencialism showing that Menis a sein (being , ser) threw in the world but not in any world Man is in the world of capitalist relation of production.He succeed
Sorry for my English it is difficult express my thougts in English.
Goodbye|||No. But it didn't stop Tescos opening another supermarket in Norwich|||He didn't even succeed in merging them with himself, let alone each other.
See Soren Kierkegaard for an earlier existentialist.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment