Contemporary continental philosophers agree that personal identity and subjectivity are not grounded in a transcendental self as a substance that defines an essential human nature.
BRIEFLY describing Sartre's understanding of self and subjectivity in terms of the implications that follow from his thought on how we should live our lives.
***please don't be an idiot with your answer. ---if it isn't helpful, it is idiotic. ThAnKs***i need help, not advice|||Is this your homework? If so, why am I going to answer it. Anywho Sarte was influential in the existential movement and your answer lies therein.|||http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sartre|||Sartre is not a "contemporary continental philosopher"; as an existentialist, he belongs very much to the old guard. You ought to read "Being and Nothingness," probably -- it will help you figure things out. You might want to read some of Husserl's work and also Heidegger's "Being and Time" first. It helps to understand where Sartre is coming from.|||in terms of consciousness: we barely connect with each other, and act from the ususal ignorant, fear based motifs in beta consciousness. improvements occur, and the heart is more open, and the fear level much lower, especially in theta; in delta we all "merge". to a profound degree. lower theta and delta, perhaps, define who we really are as a species. alas, this culture, and most other "modern/post modern" ones are addicted to beta, and are not really "functional" at the other levels. a true adept can navigate all levels with precision, and is not riddled with fear and confusion.|||dead french fart
rhymes with j p s
this is very helpful if youre learning poetry!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment